Spende german-foreign-policy.com
logo
News in brief
Krieg in Europa?
24.09.2014
Der ehemalige Bundeskanzler Helmut Schmidt warnt vor einem neuen Krieg in Europa.

Verletzte ausgeflogen
03.09.2014
Die Bundeswehr hat 20 verwundete Kämpfer aus der Ukraine zur Behandlung nach Deutschland ausgeflogen.

Außen und innen
26.08.2014
Der deutsche Außenminister moniert eine mangelnde Zustimmung in der Bevölkerung für eine offensive deutsche Weltpolitik.

Die Verantwortung Berlins
20.05.2014
Der ehemalige EU-Kommissar Günter Verheugen erhebt im Konflikt um die Ukraine schwere Vorwürfe gegen Berlin.

"Ein gutes Deutschland"
30.04.2014
Das deutsche Staatsoberhaupt schwingt sich zum Lehrmeister der Türkei auf.

Die Dynamik des "Pravy Sektor"
11.03.2014
Der Jugendverband der NPD kündigt einen "Europakongress" unter Beteiligung des "Pravy Sektor" ("Rechter Sektor") aus der Ukraine an.

Der Mann der Deutschen
18.02.2014
Die deutsche Kanzlerin hat am gestrigen Montag zwei Anführer der Proteste in der Ukraine empfangen.

Die Herero als Terroristen
17.02.2014
Die Wochenzeitung der staatlich geförderten "Landsmannschaft Ostpreußen" erklärt die Herero zu "Terroristen" und den deutschen Genozid an ihnen zum "Krieg gegen den Terror".

Zukunftspläne für die Ukraine
07.12.2013
Eine führende deutsche EU-Politikerin hat in Kiew mit dem Anführer der extrem rechten Partei Swoboda verhandelt.

Strafanzeige
15.10.2013
Gegen die scheidende Staatsministerin im Auswärtigen Amt Cornelia Pieper ist Strafanzeige wegen öffentlicher Leugnung von NS-Massenmorden erstattet worden.

Bridgehead to the Arctic
2009/05/13
REYKJAVIC/BERLIN
(Own report) - Seeing Iceland as a "strategic bridgehead" to the Arctic realm for the EU, government advisors in Berlin are hoping that Iceland will join the European Union. The German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) supports the thesis that Reykjavik's joining the EU would be advantageous because the Arctic Ocean will be of great significance as a source of mineral resources and maritime route, due to the melting of the polar cap. Observers are predicting hard struggles for influence (a new "Great Game") and a prompt militarization in the Arctic, on which the island-nation borders. Iceland is a NATO member. Militarily, it was until now, mainly linked to the United States. Since Iceland's financial collapse, the political establishment has been vigorously debating whether to join the EU. A rapid initiation of negotiations is being considered. But SWP warns that a "concerted effort" of politics and the media will be essential to overcome the EU skepticism in Icelandic public opinion to win the mandatory referendum.
Dollar or Euro
Iceland's new EU membership debate is a direct consequence of last autumn's financial collapse. The Icelandic currency - the Krone - crashed and should "be scrapped, according to the predominating opinion," reports the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP).[1] "The introduction of either the dollar or the Norwegian Krone is Under consideration," or as an alternative, a rapid membership to the Euro zone. Even before the onset of the international financial and economic crisis, sectors of the establishment were pondering "whether integration into the Euro zone would be possible without having to become a full EU member," explains SWP. But the EU does not accept this. In the aftermath of the state financial collapse, the Icelandic crisis has now reached such proportions that a majority of this country's overwhelmingly EU skeptical population is at least in favor of initiating membership negotiations - for the sake of introducing the Euro. During the election campaign, the newly elected social democratic prime minister had declared that she would like to initiate talks with Brussels in June, at the latest. She won the April elections with a clear margin.
Loss of Sovereignty
The negotiations could reach agreements on a number of issues, for example Iceland is already not only a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), it has also joined the Schengen Agreement realm and therefore is already applying pivotal EU legal norms. Still the SWP cautions against a membership euphoria. The think-tank writes that, above all, serious dissention can be expected over fishing. The fishing and fish processing industry are considered the overriding basis of the Icelandic economy. Reykjavik is not going to relinquish its control, supposes the SWP, whereas the EU will insist on "communalizing the nation's territorial waters." Berlin's government advisors see absolutely no "possibility of compromise" on the question of the "self-management of the national fishing grounds." Therefore a break-down in negotiations is not to be excluded.[2]
Power, Millions and Media
The SWP, in any case, sees also problems coming with the referendum, which is mandatory for Iceland to join the EU. Not only the political establishment in Reykjavik is "more Euro-skeptic" than "any of the other Nordic countries," according to the think-tank, but also the population. Similar referenda in other countries have shown that usually "public opinion becomes more critical, as the conditions of membership become more concrete and the focus of political debates." Of course "this trend in opinion could again change to the advantage of the EU," but "from experience, this would require a concerted effort of the political elite with 'power, millions and media,' as one Norwegian EU opponent once put it," writes SWP.[3]
Great Game
Still, the government advisors are calling for Berlin's supporting Reykjavik's bid to become a member. The country's economic resources, with its population of less than 300,000, are limited. But if an agreement on fishing is unexpectedly reached, the SWP speculates, Iceland could "bring also the last Nordic nation into the EU," meaning Norway.[4] Earlier efforts to integrate Norway into the EU were also thwarted on the question of fishing. Above all, Iceland would be a "strategic bridgehead to the Arctic realm, which is growing in significance for the EU" the advisors explain. Because the icecap is receding, due to climate change, the North Pole's voluminous amounts of mineral deposits could be profitably exploited over the next few decades, and new maritime trade routes opened through the Arctic Ocean. (german-foreign-policy.com reported.[5]) Observers see the possibility "of a new 'Great Game' developing in the Arctic."[6] "That kind of geopolitical competition could lead to a progressive militarization of the Arctic."
EU Rather Than USA
In this case, Iceland, the "strategic bridgehead," would have great significance. This island-nation, bordering directly on the Arctic Ocean, does not have its own armed forces. But it is a founding member of NATO and is bound to a defense treaty with the United States, which, until 2006, had maintained a military base in Keflavik (near Reykjavik). This provided Washington the possibility of controlling the Atlantic, half-way to its erstwhile system opponent, the Soviet Union. The base, having lost its importance, has been abandoned for more than two and a half years. Serving as a "bridgehead" to the Arctic provides Iceland a new geo-strategic importance for future conflicts. The EU should take advantage, says the SWP.
Special Relations
SWP predicts, that the German government's vigorous support for Iceland's attempt to join the EU, places Berlin in a long-term advantageous position - even if Iceland decides against the membership. The advisors remind that also Norway, in spite of intensive German lobbying, decided twice not to become a member. Yet the German government's engagement paid off. SWP notes with satisfaction that "today, Germany has an excellent partnership of strategic importance with Norway, in spite of the latter's special status at the outskirts of the EU."[7]
top print
© Informationen zur Deutschen Außenpolitik

info@german-foreign-policy.com

Valid XHTML 1.0!