Spende german-foreign-policy.com
logo
News in brief
Truppensteller
11.01.2010
Deutschland bindet armenische Soldaten in den Kriegseinsatz in Afghanistan ein.

Unglaubwürdig
09.12.2009
Zahlreiche Kritiker fordern die Einstellung der Abschiebungen von Roma in das Kosovo.

Die politische Mitte
09.10.2009
Tonangebende deutsche Medien fordern Anerkennung für rassistische Äußerungen eines Vorstands der Bundesbank.

Zur Sonne, zum Profit
07.10.2009
Der Atomkonzern Siemens übernimmt ein führendes Solarunternehmen in Israel und strebt nach einer Spitzenposition auf dem Weltmarkt.

Elite gegen Unterschicht
06.10.2009
Rassistische Forderungen eines Vorstands der Bundesbank stoßen auf Zustimmung in tonangebenden Kreisen der Bundesrepublik.

Kriegsverbrechen
02.10.2009
Der für das Massaker von Kunduz verantwortliche Oberst wird vermutlich vor Gericht gestellt und verurteilt.

Jederzeit kriegsbereit
30.09.2009
Berlin blockiert Bemühungen Schwedens, seine Ausgaben für das EU-Militär zu senken und zu diesem Zweck die Verfügbarkeit der Battle Groups einzuschränken.

Keine Kritik
16.09.2009
Der Außenminister Frankreichs entschuldigt sich bei Deutschland für seine Kritik an dem Massaker von Kunduz.

Armee im Kampf
09.09.2009
Am gestrigen Dienstag ist in Berlin das Ehrenmal der Bundeswehr eingeweiht worden.

Für eine Handvoll Dollar
05.09.2009
Wegen des nächtlichen Diebstahls zweier Benzintanks haben die deutschen Besatzungstruppen in Afghanistan über 90 Menschen töten lassen.

An Educational Venue
2009/03/04
MUNICH
(Own report) - In the wake of the controversy over the "Center Against Expulsions," an association of resettled Germans is pushing a parallel revisionist program in Munich. The Sudeten German territorial association wants to establish a "Sudeten-German Museum" in Munich to present the "History of the Germans in the Bohemian Territories", particularly the "expulsion" of the German speaking population from Czechoslovakia. An exhibit that could serve as the centerpiece of the museum's exposition has been shown throughout Germany for the past two years. It combines hefty anti-Prague invectives with attacks on the WW I peace treaties while proposing "reparations" for the resettled. They accuse the former Czechoslovak President, Edvard Benes, of complicity in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Jews. The project received state subventions. The planned Sudeten-German Museum is supposed to be an "educational venue for pupils" and "as a center of Central-European cooperation (...) contribute toward European integration."
State Promoted
An exhibit that was first shown in May 2007 in the Bavarian parliament is a possible centerpiece of the Sudeten-German Museum. It was initiated by the Sudeten-German Council, an institution that sees itself as being "above party lines" - half its members are chosen by the Sudeten-German Territorial Association, the other half from the parties in the German Federal Parliament. The exhibit received financial subventions from the state, particularly from the budget of the state of Bavaria. This exhibit was on display not only in Bavaria, but also in other states, including Baden Wuerttemberg (Stuttgart) and Hesse (Wiesbaden).
Munich Dictate: "Valid"
The exhibit revolves around internationally recognized declarations concerning the Munich Dictate (September 30, 1938) as well as the Peace Treaties concluding the First World War. The founding of Czechoslovakia was sealed with these peace treaties, the Munich Dictate - with the approval of Nazi Germany's taking control of the Sudeten Region - led to its temporary suspension. "Interesting, from the point of view of international law," one reads in the exhibit, "is that in the operative part of the agreement, there is no mention of 'cession' but rather of 'evacuation' of the border region." This choice of words hints that the "Sudetenland is interpreted as occupied territory, that had never been a legitimate part of Czechoslovakia." Seen in this light, the lack of Prague's signature on the Munich Dictate would not impinge upon "the validity of the agreement." The argumentation about the alleged validity of the Munich Dictate calls to mind that no West German government has ever characterized the dictate as "null and void from the outset."[1]
Czechoslovak Occupation
The organizers of the Munich exposition openly place the legitimacy of the founding of Czechoslovakia into question. They claim that the Prague government's measures to stabilize the new state in 1919, were aimed at "occupying the Sudeten territory", an expression normally used to describe the Wehrmacht's invasion into the neighboring country in early 1938. They write that with these measures in 1919, the Prague government violated the "International Convention Concerning the Law and Customs of War on Land concluded in 1907." While characterizing measures to stabilize the Czechoslovak state as war crimes, the organizers of the exposition praise the laws on minorities of the Habsburg Empire, which collapsed in 1918. Concerning Czechoslovakia, they speak of the "discrimination of Sudeten Germans", using historical references, submitted to the public without comment, including a 1936 document published in Carlsbad and Leipzig by the Karl Hermann Frank Publishing House. A few years later, Frank became a member of the inner circle of the Nazi rulers of the Prague protectorate.
Abandoned Villages
Attacks on the Czechoslovak post war legislation supplement the attacks on Prague and the Paris Peace Treaties. Of the Beneš Decrees, which have constitutional status in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, one reads: "Not all of the Decrees' provisions are in violation of international law." Verbal attacks are particularly directed at those Beneš Decrees regulating the expropriation and expulsion of Nazi collaborators and profiteers. The organizers of the exposition are obviously convinced that reparations must be paid to the expellees and the expropriated or their descendants. There are numerous abandoned villages in the Czech Republic that expelled Germans could take over, they say.
Beneš: Complicity
The invectives are not only directed at international law but also at Prague, particularly at the former Czechoslovak President, Edvard Beneš. He is accused of "grave errors" for saying - during his exile in London - that "the Nazis treated Jews and Slavs similarly or in the same manner". The organizers of the Munich exposition are accusing Beneš of complicity in the death of hundreds of thousands of European Jews: "It was also because of this false information that the Western allies failed to provide even simple aid to the persecuted Jews - for example granting refugees unlimited admission or bombing the routes leading to the concentration camps."
European Integration
The Sudeten German Museum that could house the exposition should be constructed at a "central location of urban development in Munich". It is sponsored by the "Sudeten German Foundation," that was created though the financial support of various state administrations, including the federal government. In the description of the Museum, one reads that "particularly the second and third generation of the Sudeten Germans and Czechs" - in other words those who were born long after resettlement - should be exposed to the historical events.[2] The memory of resettlement is to be kept alive - even if the resettled have long since died. This revisionist project is using the resettled to maintain state claims on the Czech Republic even with a European camouflage: "As a centre for cooperation in central Europe," the planned museum "could serve European integration."[3]
top print
© Informationen zur Deutschen Außenpolitik

info@german-foreign-policy.com

Valid XHTML 1.0!